<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474</id><updated>2012-01-31T17:57:34.041Z</updated><title type='text'>Factchecking Pollyanna</title><subtitle type='html'>Trying to factcheck Polly Toynbee.  Because her editor clearly doesn't.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>88</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-3275243167665392358</id><published>2006-12-31T10:17:00.001Z</published><updated>2007-02-22T13:19:02.474Z</updated><title type='text'>My top ten favourite Toynbee errors</title><summary type='text'> Between May and December 2006, this blog detailed the factual errors in Polly Toynbee's columns.  I have now stopped doing this, but here are my favourite Toynbee errors for that period: 10. Polly implies that 142% of people are dissatisfied with Tony Blair [insert own joke]. 9. Polly asks of "Cameron's set" the following question: "Do they know the median (middle England) salary is just £21,000</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/3275243167665392358/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=3275243167665392358' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/3275243167665392358'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/3275243167665392358'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/12/my-top-ten-favourite-toynbee-errors.html' title='My top ten favourite Toynbee errors'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-7371358316163564100</id><published>2006-12-31T10:11:00.001Z</published><updated>2007-02-22T13:19:23.881Z</updated><title type='text'>Shutters down</title><summary type='text'>After eight enjoyable months, I'm going to mothball this blog.  This is not because Polly Toynbee has suddenly started using real facts that she undertsands -- on the contrary, her sloppiness and inaccuracy continue unabated. No, rather it is because I want to do other things more than I want to do this. This blog -- my first serious effort at concerted blogging -- was an experiment that was </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/7371358316163564100/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=7371358316163564100' title='15 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/7371358316163564100'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/7371358316163564100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/12/shutters-down.html' title='Shutters down'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>15</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-1982354572273879918</id><published>2006-12-29T07:35:00.001Z</published><updated>2007-02-22T13:19:36.689Z</updated><title type='text'>No gift of accuracy or consistency for Xmas</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes of:  Restore the laws limiting media ownership by any one magnate, abolished by Margaret Thatcher to let Rupert Murdoch acquire his empire, so that he now owns over 40% of the press plus ever more dominant Sky. Thanks to my goof over circulation and readership, we've seen the results for both; News International has 32% of circulation and 36% of readership.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/1982354572273879918/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=1982354572273879918' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/1982354572273879918'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/1982354572273879918'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/12/no-gift-of-accuracy-or-consistency-for.html' title='No gift of accuracy or consistency for Xmas'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-6287466430250756924</id><published>2006-12-22T07:55:00.001Z</published><updated>2007-02-22T13:19:47.352Z</updated><title type='text'>Fantastic!</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:  Thus Gordon Brown personally is well ahead of the three party leaders as "doing a good job". Blair's rating is -34, Cameron is -5 and Campbell -9. The MORI research actually has Brown on zero -- it says:  Over two in five (42%) people say they are satisfied with Gordon Brown's performance with as many saying they are dissatisfied — giving a net </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/6287466430250756924/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=6287466430250756924' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6287466430250756924'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6287466430250756924'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/12/fantastic.html' title='Fantastic!'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-2915762989985252864</id><published>2006-12-19T09:00:00.001Z</published><updated>2007-02-22T13:20:17.229Z</updated><title type='text'>Channelling Lionel Richie, strangely enough</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:  But yesterday Hutton shook a threatening stick at those he regards as social-contract defaulters. He made a good case: one in 10 of those who draw jobseeker's allowance has spent six of the past seven years on benefits... In fact, he talked about 12 per cent according to the, er, Guardian, which is a lot closer to one in eight, and is certainly not one in</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/2915762989985252864/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=2915762989985252864' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/2915762989985252864'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/2915762989985252864'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/12/channelling-lionel-richie-strangely.html' title='Channelling Lionel Richie, strangely enough'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-4019646639084480068</id><published>2006-12-15T08:07:00.001Z</published><updated>2007-02-22T13:20:30.802Z</updated><title type='text'>More hot air</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:  Political pessimists fear that nothing short of the catastrophic flooding of New York, with millions dead, will make the rich world understand that climate change really is the greatest global terror of all. Now the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development issues a warning on the future of the Alpine skiing industry. Could a lack of snow in </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/4019646639084480068/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=4019646639084480068' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/4019646639084480068'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/4019646639084480068'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/12/more-hot-air.html' title='More hot air'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-6018043161981596480</id><published>2006-12-12T00:52:00.001Z</published><updated>2006-12-12T00:53:34.980Z</updated><title type='text'>Something rotten</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:  ...if they [the Tories] regain power, they will at least be embarrassed if child poverty soars as it did last time (from one child in nine in 1979 to one in three by the time they left office). The last two times we had figures from Toynbee about child poverty in 1979, it was 14%, which is one in seven, and not one in nine. -o0o- She also writes:  Tax </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/6018043161981596480/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=6018043161981596480' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6018043161981596480'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6018043161981596480'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/12/something-rotten.html' title='Something rotten'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-5210230894969661825</id><published>2006-12-08T01:52:00.001Z</published><updated>2006-12-08T07:18:09.660Z</updated><title type='text'>Wealth OK, income not; accumulate but don't earn</title><summary type='text'>In today's column (can't seem to find it online yet.  UPDATE it is now here) Polly Toynbee writes:  Meanwhile the annual Rich List this week will show runaway wealth at the very top jumping up another 18.4%. (Maybe that's modest for self-made stars and private entrepreneurs, when the real scandal is CEOs of top public companies paying themselves 30% more this year.) The 18.4% increase in "runaway</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/5210230894969661825/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=5210230894969661825' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/5210230894969661825'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/5210230894969661825'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/12/wealth-ok-income-not-accumulate-but-don.html' title='Wealth OK, income not; accumulate but don&amp;#39;t earn'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-629782258645702008</id><published>2006-12-06T16:20:00.001Z</published><updated>2006-12-06T16:20:10.973Z</updated><title type='text'>Hot air</title><summary type='text'>In a Comment is Free post today, Polly Toynbee writes:  Apparently Arnold Schwarzenegger drives his own Humvee in San Francisco - but it runs on hyrodrogen - so size may not always matter. It is nice to see a source, particularly as it makes the debunking that much easier.  According to the Forbes article that Polly refers to:  Hummer's parent, General Motors (nyse: GM - news - people ), owns the</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/629782258645702008/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=629782258645702008' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/629782258645702008'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/629782258645702008'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/12/hot-air.html' title='Hot air'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-7225499965575371807</id><published>2006-12-05T02:32:00.001Z</published><updated>2006-12-05T02:32:41.551Z</updated><title type='text'>A little Miss Tree</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:  Think of Easter Island and the history of its destruction, recounted by Jared Diamond in his book Collapse. The Easter Islanders became so obsessed with their own status symbols, the moai - the mighty stone statues for which their island is famous - that in erecting them they destroyed every tree that made life on the island sustainable, competing clan </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/7225499965575371807/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=7225499965575371807' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/7225499965575371807'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/7225499965575371807'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/12/little-miss-tree.html' title='A little Miss Tree'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-5569904206890562953</id><published>2006-12-01T13:47:00.001Z</published><updated>2006-12-04T21:17:13.943Z</updated><title type='text'>Mea culpa</title><summary type='text'>I am embarassed to admit that yes, I did indeed quote circulation figures to refute Polly's claim about readers.  Mea culpa. I was wrong. Readership figures for most major newspapers can be found here.  I do not have time right now to re-do the calculations, bu suggestions in the comments of previous posts suggest that the 40% figure is still wrong, but not as wrong as I claimed.  (I would note </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/5569904206890562953/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=5569904206890562953' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/5569904206890562953'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/5569904206890562953'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/12/mea-culpa.html' title='Mea culpa'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-7159360536089810296</id><published>2006-12-01T07:45:00.001Z</published><updated>2006-12-04T21:17:02.485Z</updated><title type='text'>Something about privilege down the ages</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes of:  the old media ownership laws that Margaret Thatcher discarded to allow Murdoch to acquire his hegemonic 40% of all newspaper readership She's done the Murdoch/40% statistic before, of course, and so have we.  (UPDATE:  See also here.) -o0o- She also writes:  At the very least, this is the time to make the pathetic Press Complaints Commission a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/7159360536089810296/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=7159360536089810296' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/7159360536089810296'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/7159360536089810296'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/12/something-about-privilege-down-ages.html' title='Something about privilege down the ages'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-1144138935958588133</id><published>2006-11-30T01:25:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-30T01:32:39.333Z</updated><title type='text'>"Armed with hard facts"?  More like a discarded sword of truth someone left lying around</title><summary type='text'>I hate to once again bring up Polly Toynbee's column on Tuesday, and in particular this quote:

    FTSE CEOs helped themselves to 30% more this year, while their directors took 28% (against an average pay rise of 2.8%). They now earn at least 76 times the average pay of their staff, when in 1980 it was just 10 times.

I have already addressed the figures in the first sentence, but take the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/1144138935958588133/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=1144138935958588133' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/1144138935958588133'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/1144138935958588133'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/armed-with-hard-facts-more-like.html' title='&quot;Armed with hard facts&quot;?  More like a discarded sword of truth someone left lying around'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-9080245622408471138</id><published>2006-11-28T08:23:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-28T10:59:24.060Z</updated><title type='text'>Ferocious indigestion</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

Yesterday, promoting their latest survey of 87 top executives, the CBI said two-thirds complain about tax. Only two-thirds? Who are the one-third who are happy with their taxes? The CBI claims the UK's "burdensome and expensive" tax system is a major factor for the 20% of firms that shifted some operations abroad and the 30% considering it. Again, what's </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/9080245622408471138/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=9080245622408471138' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/9080245622408471138'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/9080245622408471138'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/ferocious-indigestion.html' title='Ferocious indigestion'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-4739246593528570345</id><published>2006-11-27T16:23:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-27T16:24:53.513Z</updated><title type='text'>Meme a little meme of me</title><summary type='text'>Tom Papworth wants to know ten things I would never do, but doesn't think I'll answer.  Let me try and boost that self-esteem.

    Trust anything Polly Toynbee says at face value (obviously)
    Ignore facts when trying to make up my mind on difficult issues
    Assume that logic is the only way of persuading people of something
    Respect people who make accusations and then change the subject</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/4739246593528570345/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=4739246593528570345' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/4739246593528570345'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/4739246593528570345'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/meme-little-meme-of-me.html' title='Meme a little meme of me'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-3012719471783861276</id><published>2006-11-27T15:32:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-12-04T21:11:59.959Z</updated><title type='text'>Marred</title><summary type='text'>A couple of fellow bloggers -- Mr. Eugenides and Not Saussure -- were kind enough to think of me when they read a BBC profile of Polly Toynbee, which included this quote:  Her editor at the Indie was Andrew Marr, a firm Toynbee admirer. "What makes her stand out as a journalist is not only her strong views," he says, "but also her ferocious appetite for research. In a media world in which too </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/3012719471783861276/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=3012719471783861276' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/3012719471783861276'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/3012719471783861276'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/marred.html' title='Marred'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-3225280681543856783</id><published>2006-11-24T21:57:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-24T22:00:01.831Z</updated><title type='text'>Not "all there"</title><summary type='text'>Polly Toynbee was on BBC1's Question Time last night, and she said:

    We saw child poverty in this country -- and this is all there in this document -- go from 14% in 1979 to 33%[you can watch it online here -- quote comes at about minute 38]

She's used these figures before, of course, without noting the inconsistency between the two series from which the numbers are taken.  However, it's not</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/3225280681543856783/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=3225280681543856783' title='6 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/3225280681543856783'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/3225280681543856783'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/not-all-there.html' title='Not &quot;all there&quot;'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>6</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-2766216132783731474</id><published>2006-11-24T05:56:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-24T05:59:26.252Z</updated><title type='text'>Lies, damned lies, and...</title><summary type='text'>On 19 February 2001, the Guardian carried an extract from Polly Toynbee and David Walker's book "Did Things Get Better?" which said:

    A quarter of the 4m poor children have been lifted out of poverty.

On 29 October 2004, Polly wrote that:

    Through tax credits, most experts agree, a million children have been lifted out of poverty

which is admirably consistent, though displays a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/2766216132783731474/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=2766216132783731474' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/2766216132783731474'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/2766216132783731474'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/lies-damned-lies-and.html' title='Lies, damned lies, and...'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-2752050146641744974</id><published>2006-11-22T20:32:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-22T20:33:38.990Z</updated><title type='text'>At least the notoreity hasn't changed her</title><summary type='text'>Polly Toynbee writes on CommentisFree that:

    In 1979 14% of children lived below the poverty line: that rose to 33% by 1996.

Sadly, these two figures come from two inconsistent sources -- the Family Expenditure Survey and the Family Resources Survey -- and cover different geographies -- the UK and Great Britain (source).</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/2752050146641744974/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=2752050146641744974' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/2752050146641744974'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/2752050146641744974'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/at-least-notoreity-hasnt-changed-her.html' title='At least the notoreity hasn&apos;t changed her'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-8061482856230028439</id><published>2006-11-22T13:16:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-22T13:21:48.228Z</updated><title type='text'>When the eagles are silent, the parrots begin to jabber</title><summary type='text'>Polly Toynbee was on the Today programme on Radio 4 this morning, being asked about Greg Clark's suggestion, reported in the Guardian, that she should replace Churchill as the inspiration for the Tory party's view of the welfare state.  She said that people were sick of:

    the city paying themselves a 28% pay increase this year and year after year after year

(You can hear the interview via </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/8061482856230028439/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=8061482856230028439' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/8061482856230028439'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/8061482856230028439'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/when-eagles-are-silent-parrots-begin-to.html' title='When the eagles are silent, the parrots begin to jabber'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-1727544037231027015</id><published>2006-11-21T07:44:00.001Z</published><updated>2006-11-21T07:44:40.880Z</updated><title type='text'>Partial, and indeed partial</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes of Bolingbroke hospital that:

    [i]t has a day hospital for some 15 elderly patients, with out-patients and imaging diagnostics.

This at best partial, it also provides a GP out of hours surgery, podiatry and community dental services (source).
-o0o-
She also writes that:

    ...empty wards cost a fortune, not counting the heat billowing out, which </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/1727544037231027015/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=1727544037231027015' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/1727544037231027015'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/1727544037231027015'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/partial-and-indeed-partial.html' title='Partial, and indeed partial'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-5953074526500289439</id><published>2006-11-20T07:37:00.001Z</published><updated>2006-11-20T18:55:17.797Z</updated><title type='text'>Present, if not correct</title><summary type='text'>Today sees Polly's third appearance this month in the Corrections and Clarifications column, which picks up on my suggestion last Tuesday that Nick Gilodi-Johnson's father couldn't be the owner of Farepak, as he died over five years ago.  It says:

    We gave the impression in a comment article that the owner of Farepack is the father of Nick Gilodi-Johnson (The Farepack scandal lays bare a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/5953074526500289439/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=5953074526500289439' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/5953074526500289439'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/5953074526500289439'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/present-if-not-correct.html' title='Present, if not correct'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-5786115869918416103</id><published>2006-11-17T08:14:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-17T18:13:17.024Z</updated><title type='text'>Inaccurate précis</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

The Nuffield's eminent group of professors of law, medicine and ethics drew up the guidelines...

The group was actually wider than this.  It also included campaigners, a doctor of social anthropology, a health economist, and a solicitor (source).
She also says that:

They recommend that babies born before 23 weeks should not be resuscitated, as only 1% </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/5786115869918416103/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=5786115869918416103' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/5786115869918416103'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/5786115869918416103'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/inaccurate-prcis.html' title='Inaccurate précis'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-4635074818245747279</id><published>2006-11-14T07:27:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-14T07:30:06.850Z</updated><title type='text'>Doesn't let death get in the way</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

Occasionally the stage curtain is twitched back to expose the way things are.

So true.  After claiming a couple of times that City bonuses were £21bn (e.g. on 22 August and again on 15 September) -- a claim which I pointed out at the time was erroneous -- in today's column we get:

When the trade minister Ian McCartney told MPs to fork out a day's pay </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/4635074818245747279/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=4635074818245747279' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/4635074818245747279'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/4635074818245747279'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/doesnt-let-death-get-in-way.html' title='Doesn&apos;t let death get in the way'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-3354653172096338855</id><published>2006-11-13T22:21:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-13T22:22:52.512Z</updated><title type='text'>Some are odder than others</title><summary type='text'>In her column on Friday, Polly wrote:

  British women are odd: traditionally, in France, Germany and Italy women lean to the left and men lean rightwards; but in Britain the right only ever won on the women's vote.

In 1979, 1983 and 1987, occasions on which the right can be have said to have won, men voted clearly for the Tories.  In 1979, 45% voted Tory to 38% Labour, in 1983 it was 46% to 30%</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/3354653172096338855/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=3354653172096338855' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/3354653172096338855'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/3354653172096338855'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/some-are-odder-than-others.html' title='Some are odder than others'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-6824437791344098633</id><published>2006-11-10T11:48:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-10T11:51:29.334Z</updated><title type='text'>Contradictory thought deathmatch</title><summary type='text'>From today's column:

    Abolish the "provocation" defence for jealous men who kill their wives.

versus

    John Reid's announcement yesterday of yet more criminal-justice legislation hardly feels like refreshment: Labour's 59 obsessive criminal-justice bills have often been repealed before they have been enacted.
</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/6824437791344098633/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=6824437791344098633' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6824437791344098633'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6824437791344098633'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/contradictory-thought-deathmatch.html' title='Contradictory thought deathmatch'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-6146246876542987967</id><published>2006-11-10T07:30:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-10T07:33:47.902Z</updated><title type='text'>Jam on the breaks</title><summary type='text'>I suggested some months ago that I needed to take more breaks, and the evidence base is growing.  While I was on a break last month, Polly wrote a piece entitled "Only a fully secular state can protect women's rights", which today prompted this correction:

We said in a comment piece, Only a fully secular state can protect women's rights, October 17, page 33, that white parents had taken over </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/6146246876542987967/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=6146246876542987967' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6146246876542987967'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6146246876542987967'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/jam-on-breaks.html' title='Jam on the breaks'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-32218822320464623</id><published>2006-11-10T06:34:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-10T06:35:45.653Z</updated><title type='text'>A more finely tuned bullshit radar</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

    at the 2005 election women and men voted identically.

Of course, the only way of getting to this is through polls, which are numerous and often contradictory.  But that should call therefore for greater precision when discussing results, not less.  There is indeed a source which claims that men and women intended to vote in almost identical ways -- </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/32218822320464623/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=32218822320464623' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/32218822320464623'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/32218822320464623'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/more-finely-tuned-bullshit-radar.html' title='A more finely tuned bullshit radar'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-1103181775881292506</id><published>2006-11-07T08:05:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-07T08:17:04.185Z</updated><title type='text'>Her id is safe!</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

    Social mobility has come to a halt, crushed by this new era of mega-greed.

Social mobility has come to a halt?  Even the much reported upon paper by Blanden, Gregg and Machin, called "Intergenerational Mobility in Europe and North America" (headlines included: 'UK low in social mobility league, says charity' in the Guardian) showed that for men born </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/1103181775881292506/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=1103181775881292506' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/1103181775881292506'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/1103181775881292506'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/her-id-is-safe.html' title='Her id is safe!'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-5359348719723373461</id><published>2006-11-03T08:14:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-03T08:15:58.118Z</updated><title type='text'>Drawing her own conclusions</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes about a report "buried" by the DWP (here on their website), in which Lisa Harker:

    concludes with this overwhelming truth: "The major drivers of poverty - such as high levels of wage and wealth inequality - remain considerable impediments towards reaching the 2020 child-poverty target, suggesting that far greater changes to the distribution of wealth, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/5359348719723373461/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=5359348719723373461' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/5359348719723373461'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/5359348719723373461'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/drawing-her-own-conclusions.html' title='Drawing her own conclusions'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-6273449476146643796</id><published>2006-11-02T08:45:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-11-02T09:17:16.140Z</updated><title type='text'>Polly now gets stealth-edited to remove the errors</title><summary type='text'>In today's "Corrections and clarifications" column in the Guardian, there is this:

A headline in last week's Catholic Herald read "Three days to save our Catholic schools", not "Three days to save our faith schools" (Government cowardice could be the death of us all, page 33, October 31).

Which refers, of course, to Polly's most recent column, which I wrote about here. Clearly, I need to use </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/6273449476146643796/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=6273449476146643796' title='14 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6273449476146643796'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6273449476146643796'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/11/polly-now-gets-stealth-edited-to-remove.html' title='Polly now gets stealth-edited to remove the errors'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>14</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-1510852062815471916</id><published>2006-10-31T06:25:00.000Z</published><updated>2006-10-31T08:28:42.394Z</updated><title type='text'>Know nothing press</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

 parents still overwhelmingly oppose religious schools - by 64% in a Guardian/ICM poll.
Actually, it's not parents, they don't oppose religious schools (but they do oppose state funding) and the, er, Guardian thinks that the timing of the poll may have affected the results:

 The survey reveals that following last month's terror attacks, the majority of </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/1510852062815471916/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=1510852062815471916' title='9 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/1510852062815471916'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/1510852062815471916'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/10/in-todays-column-polly-toynbee-writes.html' title='Know nothing press'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>9</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-6186322380060839622</id><published>2006-10-27T08:32:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-10-27T08:35:47.268+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Anyone have a bridge that needs painting?</title><summary type='text'>There's more from Polly's column today (see previous post for the bulk of it, though).  Polly writes:

    On behalf of shareholders, simple questions should be put: why do directors pay themselves obscene sums, a 28% rise in the boardrooms this year, all of it stolen from citizens' pension funds and Peps?[emphasis added]

Compare that with this, from the Guardian on 2 October 2006:

    </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/6186322380060839622/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=6186322380060839622' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6186322380060839622'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6186322380060839622'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/10/anyone-have-bridge-that-needs-painting.html' title='Anyone have a bridge that needs painting?'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-6126497402902028256</id><published>2006-10-27T08:26:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-10-27T08:27:46.911+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Now just plain making stuff up</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes about the proposed companies bill, and specifically a clause to require companies to disclose information about their suppliers.  She writes:

    The Financial Times all this week has run a loud and intimidating campaign against one clause, with a front-page splash and yesterday's thundering leader attacking industry minister Margaret Hodge. The subclause </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/6126497402902028256/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=6126497402902028256' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6126497402902028256'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6126497402902028256'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/10/now-just-plain-making-stuff-up.html' title='Now just plain making stuff up'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-373526883517881540</id><published>2006-10-24T10:12:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-10-24T10:34:32.582+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Disgraceful</title><summary type='text'>In today's column about Velcade, Polly Toynbee writes:

    Disgracefully, Andrew Lansley, the shadow health secretary, claimed at the weekend that he would prescribe the drug, adding an absurd promise that he would also "renegotiate" its price with the manufacturers. As if.
    Paying no attention to Nice's rebuttal, ITV's The Sunday Edition paraded three patients with bone-marrow cancer </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/373526883517881540/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=373526883517881540' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/373526883517881540'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/373526883517881540'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/10/disgraceful.html' title='Disgraceful'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-2342691146246613401</id><published>2006-10-05T18:07:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-10-05T18:08:30.275+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Wariness replaced by weariness</title><summary type='text'>I'll be taking a break until the end of October.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/2342691146246613401/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=2342691146246613401' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/2342691146246613401'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/2342691146246613401'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/10/wariness-replaced-by-weariness.html' title='Wariness replaced by weariness'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-6575407717988958599</id><published>2006-10-03T06:36:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-10-03T06:40:28.864+01:00</updated><title type='text'>In a manor secret</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee refers to the Coleshill Manor story.  She thinks it employs a

secret staff of 50

So secret, in fact, that they advertise for jobs (see here for Google's cache of a now expired job advertisment, which was running on 21 June).  So secret that Michael Howard publicised his visit to it on election day 2005 (source).  So secret that the Telegraph had a story about it</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/6575407717988958599/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=6575407717988958599' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6575407717988958599'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6575407717988958599'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/10/in-manor-secret.html' title='In a manor secret'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-5585209923747295477</id><published>2006-09-29T07:20:00.001+01:00</published><updated>2006-09-29T07:20:50.178+01:00</updated><title type='text'>And she thinks he's an attack dog?</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee quotes extensively from:

Deborah Mattinson, the chief executive of Opinion Leader Research

A shame she doesn't bother to get the job title right.
-o0o-
She writes about Frank Luntz's polling exercise for Newsnight thus:

He must have been excited by a spectacular item on Newsnight. The US pollster Frank Luntz explored the popularity of Labour's possible </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/5585209923747295477/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=5585209923747295477' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/5585209923747295477'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/5585209923747295477'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/09/and-she-thinks-hes-attack-dog.html' title='And she thinks he&apos;s an attack dog?'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-9029017932139082588</id><published>2006-09-27T08:03:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-09-27T08:05:20.959+01:00</updated><title type='text'>The un-quote</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes of Blair's farewell speech:
The deftness of his opening Cherie joke - "She won't run off with the bloke next door" - was all the reminder they needed.
I'm enough of an old-fashioned pedant to think that when you put something between quote marks, it should be what someone actually said.  Polly clearly disagrees.  What Blair actually said was:
"At least I </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/9029017932139082588/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=9029017932139082588' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/9029017932139082588'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/9029017932139082588'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/09/un-quote.html' title='The un-quote'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-3188579048254031311</id><published>2006-09-26T08:17:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-09-26T08:20:01.922+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Whoa, Manchester</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

Labour rules on the mandate of just a quarter of the electorate.

Would that it were a quarter of the electorate, in fact it is comfortably below (source).
And rules?  Rules?  I thought they governed.
-o0o-

His good idea this week has been devolving within Whitehall - at last creating a sensible divide between the board (ministers) setting the direction </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/3188579048254031311/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=3188579048254031311' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/3188579048254031311'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/3188579048254031311'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/09/whoa-manchester.html' title='Whoa, Manchester'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-6734630606403923629</id><published>2006-09-26T00:12:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-09-26T00:14:04.496+01:00</updated><title type='text'>A little White truth-seeking</title><summary type='text'>On GU's Labour conference podcast yesterday (MP3 here), hosted by her colleague Mike White, Polly Toynbee said this (about 14m50s in):
TOYNBEE: ... Tony Blair took such a very different view about Iraq to all of the rest of the people of Europe, who were 90% against going into Iraq, so it was we who stuck out like a sore thumb on that...
WHITE: Ooh, I'm going to check that percent.

You'd be wise</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/6734630606403923629/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=6734630606403923629' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6734630606403923629'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/6734630606403923629'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/09/little-white-truth-seeking.html' title='A little White truth-seeking'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-3819613998295649886</id><published>2006-09-22T10:29:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-09-22T10:30:10.787+01:00</updated><title type='text'>National press unreliable?  I wonder why.</title><summary type='text'>In today's column (see previous post for link), Polly also writes:

    There is a sharp difference between recent patients and those who draw their view only from media anecdotage or from bad-mouthing friends among the 1.2 million grumbling NHS staff. Polling shows that patients are overwhelmingly pleased with their GPs and hospitals - but voters who haven't used hospitals are unreasonably </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/3819613998295649886/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=3819613998295649886' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/3819613998295649886'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/3819613998295649886'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/09/national-press-unreliable-i-wonder-why.html' title='National press unreliable?  I wonder why.'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-8757422716616748656</id><published>2006-09-22T07:44:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-09-22T07:45:26.184+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Correlatus belli</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

If the Iraq analogy seems over the top, consider this: Ipsos Mori finds that attitudes towards the NHS are coloured by what voters already think of the government - not the other way round, as previously assumed. Disenchantment with the government translates into scepticism about the NHS. So all the reasons why Labour is slipping in support - Iraq and its</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/8757422716616748656/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=8757422716616748656' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/8757422716616748656'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/8757422716616748656'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/09/correlatus-belli.html' title='Correlatus belli'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-674084049440415666</id><published>2006-09-19T15:46:00.001+01:00</published><updated>2006-09-19T15:46:54.443+01:00</updated><title type='text'>What happened to the middle class?</title><summary type='text'>In a follow-up post, Polly Toynbee writes today that Sweden:

  [let] private schools enter the state system with state finding, now educating some 7% of pupils

and that 

  What he [Adonis] doesn't say is that the middle classes mostly use the private schools, with a drastic effect on making schools far more socially segregated than they were before.

So, if private schools educate 7% of kids, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/674084049440415666/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=674084049440415666' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/674084049440415666'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/674084049440415666'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/09/what-happened-to-middle-class.html' title='What happened to the middle class?'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-4142214482726308129</id><published>2006-09-19T01:32:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-09-19T01:34:55.840+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Swede dreams</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

   Aware of the threat from a new young face after 12 years in office, Goran Persson tried to deflect criticism for staying too long by promoting fresh-faced young ministers, as Tony Blair has.

Persson has not been prime minister for 12 years -- he has held the office since 22 March 1996 (source).</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/4142214482726308129/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=4142214482726308129' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/4142214482726308129'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/4142214482726308129'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/09/swede-dreams.html' title='Swede dreams'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115830259065657931</id><published>2006-09-15T07:43:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-09-15T07:43:57.133+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Hiss, and indeed sneer</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

    With City bonuses this year at over £21bn, earnings themselves could and should be fairer

We've done the lie about City bonuses and the £21bn before, of course, so forgive me for not repeating myself.
-o0o-
She also writes that:

    Is the tax system too complicated? The CBI and other rightwing critics protest at a "rococo" bureaucracy where</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115830259065657931/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115830259065657931' title='7 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115830259065657931'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115830259065657931'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/09/in-todays-column-polly-toynbee-writes.html' title='Hiss, and indeed sneer'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>7</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115779980425188658</id><published>2006-09-09T12:03:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-09-09T12:26:32.350+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Belching out balls in all directions</title><summary type='text'>On Comment is Free yesterday, Polly writes of Charles Clarke:

    Could he see a slender "plague on both your houses" window of opportunity open up? He wouldn't rule it out yesterday. Does Malvolio come to mind?

Not unless you are confusing Malvolio and Mercutio, no.
</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115779980425188658/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115779980425188658' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115779980425188658'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115779980425188658'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/09/belching-out-balls-in-all-directions.html' title='Belching out balls in all directions'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115760707192200178</id><published>2006-09-07T06:31:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-09-07T06:31:11.933+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Twice as bad</title><summary type='text'>In a piece today on Comment is Free, Polly Toynbee writes:

    As for these polls, just remember that the same voters who say they don't want Blair to go yet are the ones who give him satisfaction ratings twice as bad as when Mrs Thatcher was toppled

It's not the same voters 16 years on, of course, but more interesting is the "twice as bad" bit.  Thatcher left on 22 November 1990, and MORI </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115760707192200178/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115760707192200178' title='16 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115760707192200178'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115760707192200178'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/09/twice-as-bad.html' title='Twice as bad'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>16</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115747388398749145</id><published>2006-09-05T17:31:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-09-05T17:32:27.226+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Polly glot</title><summary type='text'>On the 25th August, I took Polly Toynbee to task for writing that:

    it [Sweden] tops the international happiness league

when in fact it doesn't.  In a piece for Dagens Nyheter (rough translation is the Daily News) yesterday, however, the language changes:

    På en global, hedonistisk skala har det här gjort er till ett av världens lyckligaste folk (trots det orättvisa ryktet om </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115747388398749145/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115747388398749145' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115747388398749145'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115747388398749145'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/09/polly-glot.html' title='Polly glot'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115744890217356338</id><published>2006-09-05T10:35:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-09-05T10:35:02.243+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Ho hum</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

    ...the NHS budget for tackling teen pregnancy has just been slashed from £18m to £5m.

Hmm.  The Teenage Pregnancy Unit is, of course, part of the DfES and not the NHS (source).
It is also misleading to imply that there is a monolithic central budget which represents the entirety of spending within the health service on teenage pregnancy.  As the</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115744890217356338/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115744890217356338' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115744890217356338'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115744890217356338'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/09/ho-hum.html' title='Ho hum'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115707252726915541</id><published>2006-09-01T02:02:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-09-01T02:02:07.506+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Les faits ne sont pas des jeux...</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

    But the US Senate has proved internet gambling can be banned, by refusing to license US companies and by banning banks and credit card companies from paying gaming sites anywhere in the world.

When she last wrote about this, back on 21 July, she was merely predicting that the "US senate is about to outlaw online gambling by preventing credit </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115707252726915541/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115707252726915541' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115707252726915541'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115707252726915541'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/09/les-faits-ne-sont-pas-des-jeux.html' title='Les faits ne sont pas des jeux...'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115683641449275998</id><published>2006-08-29T08:26:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-08-29T08:33:24.826+01:00</updated><title type='text'>How can you only have another year of a perpetual attack?</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes that:

    Tipping the boat on one side, Stephen Byers' latest assault in the Times from the Blairite extreme is outrageously provocative, demanding to cement the future long after the leader has gone. [...]  Every word Byers wrote implied that Brown is some kind of old Labour warhorse waiting to hoist the red flag in Downing Street - even though Brown </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115683641449275998/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115683641449275998' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115683641449275998'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115683641449275998'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/08/how-can-you-only-have-another-year-of.html' title='How can you only have another year of a perpetual attack?'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115648907269585473</id><published>2006-08-25T07:57:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-08-25T09:16:14.626+01:00</updated><title type='text'>What is happiness, really?</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee tells us that:

    it [Sweden] tops the international happiness league

Which international happiness league?  Not this one, which asks about "life satisfaction", where it is Switzerland that tops the league table.  Not this one, which is the proportion of people saying they are happy less the proportion who say they are unhappy, where it is Iceland which </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115648907269585473/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115648907269585473' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115648907269585473'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115648907269585473'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/08/what-is-happiness-really.html' title='What is happiness, really?'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115623076887756860</id><published>2006-08-22T08:12:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-08-22T08:12:49.143+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Mendacious figures?  I'll give you mendacious figures.</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

    This week City dealers' bonuses soared higher than ever, to £21bn, dwarfing the £3.3bn tax take from all their inheritances.

No.  It's not just city dealers: "The ONS said the overall bonus figures cover the vast majority of Britain's companies, include [sic] bonuses to boardroom executives" says the, er, Guardian -- which also pegs the figure at</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115623076887756860/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115623076887756860' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115623076887756860'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115623076887756860'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/08/mendacious-figures-ill-give-you.html' title='Mendacious figures?  I&apos;ll give you mendacious figures.'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115597695078333588</id><published>2006-08-19T09:42:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-08-19T09:42:31.026+01:00</updated><title type='text'>A little trifle for the weekend</title><summary type='text'>Polly Toynbee has been given awards and honorary degrees over the course of her career.  I read a couple of the pieces celebrating these, including this when the Political Studies Association made her Political Journalist of the Year for 2003, this when Loughborough University made her Honorary Graduand in 2004 and this when Essex University made her a Doctor of the University.
There at least </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115597695078333588/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115597695078333588' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115597695078333588'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115597695078333588'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/08/little-trifle-for-weekend.html' title='A little trifle for the weekend'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115581044733727736</id><published>2006-08-17T11:27:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-08-17T15:07:17.246+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Polly maths</title><summary type='text'>WARNING: this post is lengthy and detailed, and does not relate to a recent column.
Polly Toynbee appeared on Radio 4's Any Questions on the 14th July, 2006 (transcript).  I would have blogged about it at the time, but I couldn't find the transcript immediately and I didn't want to rely on my memory to criticise.  I did, however, stumble across the transcript on the web the other day, and </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115581044733727736/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115581044733727736' title='7 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115581044733727736'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115581044733727736'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/08/polly-maths.html' title='Polly maths'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>7</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115562927837232138</id><published>2006-08-15T09:07:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-08-15T09:07:58.756+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Re-commissioning</title><summary type='text'>Today's Polly Toynbee column has lots of broad assertions of opinion rather than poorly-researched facts.  However, this sentence is particularly troubling:

    A new Commission on Integration and Cohesion, launching this month, will be worthless unless its first recommendation is to end religious and ethnic segregation in schools.

The commission is anything but new.  Charles Clarke </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115562927837232138/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115562927837232138' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115562927837232138'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115562927837232138'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/08/re-commissioning.html' title='Re-commissioning'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115527491320221014</id><published>2006-08-11T06:41:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-08-11T06:41:53.276+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Allergic even to the word 'research'</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

    The Institute for Public Policy Studies says migrants are profitable: for every £100 in taxes paid by the average British-born person, the average new immigrant pays £112. Migrants make up only 8.7% of the UK's population but pay 10.2% of its income tax.

I think she means the Institute for Public Policy Research -- their press release with these </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115527491320221014/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115527491320221014' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115527491320221014'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115527491320221014'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/08/allergic-even-to-word-research.html' title='Allergic even to the word &apos;research&apos;'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115502119550580423</id><published>2006-08-08T08:13:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-08-08T08:13:15.810+01:00</updated><title type='text'>New terms</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

    He [Blair] has upped Britain's pledge in a tougher carbon trading regime for the second EU round. But since 1997 UK emissions are up 3%.

If you look at National Statistics' Environmental Accounts Spring 2006 (pdf link here), and in particular table 2.3, you'll see that in 1997, the UK's total emissions of greenhouse gasses were 754,793 thousand </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115502119550580423/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115502119550580423' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115502119550580423'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115502119550580423'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/08/new-terms.html' title='New terms'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115418335111993659</id><published>2006-07-29T15:29:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-07-29T15:38:14.956+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Better or Worse? p.54</title><summary type='text'>With no columns in the Guardian this week, there has been little Polly Toynbee output to factcheck.  So I turn once again to Better or Worse? Has Labour Delivered?, the book Polly co-wrote with David Walker.  The challenge is to open it to a random page, and try to find a factual inaccuracy.
On page 54 (my edition is a Bloomsbury paperback), Polly writes:

    In 2003 the child of a father in </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115418335111993659/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115418335111993659' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115418335111993659'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115418335111993659'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/07/better-or-worse-p54.html' title='Better or Worse? p.54'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115346563638548100</id><published>2006-07-21T08:07:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-07-21T08:18:42.860+01:00</updated><title type='text'>She would bet on it</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

    Cowardice often hides behind "globalisation" as an excuse for inertia. Often it is the Americans who puncture the convenient myth of the helpless nation-state. Here's the latest example: the US senate is about to outlaw online gambling by preventing credit cards and banks paying out to gaming sites...  The US shows you can just ban the banks from </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115346563638548100/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115346563638548100' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115346563638548100'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115346563638548100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/07/she-would-bet-on-it.html' title='She would bet on it'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115319753944868120</id><published>2006-07-18T05:38:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-07-18T05:49:57.636+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Still unclear</title><summary type='text'>Today's Polly Toynbee column says:

    The eyes of would-be nuclear builders, meanwhile, are on Areva, the French government- subsidised company building in Finland the first new nuclear station anywhere in decades.

It might be instructive to compare that with this, from a column in the Guardian from August 2004:

    Nuclear has, however, found an important niche market in Asia. Of 27 </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115319753944868120/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115319753944868120' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115319753944868120'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115319753944868120'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/07/still-unclear.html' title='Still unclear'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115285970567346049</id><published>2006-07-14T07:48:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-07-14T07:59:34.710+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Fun ding-dong</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee says:

    Party fundraising did for Chancellor Kohl, the man who united East and West Germany at great political and financial risk

Actually, the scandal broke in 1999 (source), over a year after he was 'done for'.  He lost a general election in 1998, when the issue wasn't at all current (source).
-o0o-
Polly also says of the Tories' proposed cap on </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115285970567346049/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115285970567346049' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115285970567346049'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115285970567346049'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/07/fun-ding-dong.html' title='Fun ding-dong'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115278030678462838</id><published>2006-07-13T09:45:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-07-13T09:45:07.423+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Recidivism</title><summary type='text'>A little bit more on Tuesday's Polly Toynbee column.  As ever, actually taking the time to go back and read the source material has cast her gift for inaccurate précis into sharp relief.  Take this quote from her column:

    Crime Concern delivers many of those designed to draw in the children regarded as at highest risk of offending. On a Rochdale estate, it achieves a 70% fall in calls to </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115278030678462838/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115278030678462838' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115278030678462838'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115278030678462838'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/07/recidivism.html' title='Recidivism'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115260055778071098</id><published>2006-07-11T07:49:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-07-11T07:49:18.186+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Let me count the ways</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

    The Audit Commission estimates that £42,000 on effective early interventions in children's lives from birth to adolescence spares £153,000 in incarceration.

There are a number of problems with this sentence, and here is a guide to them:

    The Audit Commission estimates(1) that £42,000 on effective early interventions in children's(2) lives </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115260055778071098/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115260055778071098' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115260055778071098'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115260055778071098'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/07/let-me-count-ways.html' title='Let me count the ways'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115225713642438276</id><published>2006-07-07T08:25:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-07-07T08:46:09.406+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Hard figures</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbe writes:

    The Work Foundation points to these hard figures: in 1980 top directors in FTSE companies were paid 10 times the average worker in their companies. By 1990 the gap had multiplied to 31.5 times. And by 2002 the top dogs were paid an enormous 75.7 times more than their average employee. It is a statistical and social impossibility to pretend that we </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115225713642438276/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115225713642438276' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115225713642438276'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115225713642438276'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/07/in-todays-column-polly-toynbe-writes.html' title='Hard figures'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115199585096334039</id><published>2006-07-04T07:50:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-07-04T16:02:24.820+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Eh, quality?</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee asks for an:

    open discussion about the danger of infinite inequality escalation.

And she probably is looking for something more sophisticated than "it's OK, it is by definition finite."  So let's get into the facts.  Polly writes:

    In personal property and liquid assets, the top 10% owns half of everything. The bottom 50% of the population owns </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115199585096334039/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115199585096334039' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115199585096334039'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115199585096334039'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/07/eh-quality.html' title='Eh, quality?'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115176159433124836</id><published>2006-07-01T14:46:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-07-01T14:46:44.886+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Unsure conclusion</title><summary type='text'>A delayed post about yesterday's column -- the result of a late flight and a heavy schedule.  Others have already pointed out that:

    Remember, before Labour there was no childcare, no nursery education and no Sure Start to help young families

is of course twaddle, and that the evidence on Head Start is ambiguous (with a source, unlike, of course, Polly).
It is interesting that when </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115176159433124836/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115176159433124836' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115176159433124836'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115176159433124836'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/07/unsure-conclusion.html' title='Unsure conclusion'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115140076723875004</id><published>2006-06-27T10:32:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-06-27T10:32:47.683+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Normal service resumed</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly writes that:

    The government only just failed to pass the "incitement to religious hatred" bill because Blair himself accidentally failed to turn up to vote.

Actually, the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 did receive royal assent on the 16 February 2006 (source).  The government lost a vote on a proposed compromise between the government's version of the bill</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115140076723875004/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115140076723875004' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115140076723875004'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115140076723875004'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/06/normal-service-resumed.html' title='Normal service resumed'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115104434413311922</id><published>2006-06-23T07:32:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-06-23T07:32:24.140+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Despite</title><summary type='text'>I clearly need to take more holidays.
As an anonymous commenter pointed out here, there was much fuss during the week about Polly's inaccurate attempt to criticise a critic -- see http://www.stephenpollard.net/002642.html.  Today brings a correction from the Guardian here:

    In a column headed Britain is smiling, but it looks daggers at Labour, page 31, June 20, we accurately reported a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115104434413311922/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115104434413311922' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115104434413311922'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115104434413311922'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/06/despite.html' title='Despite'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115042209911314432</id><published>2006-06-16T02:41:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-06-16T02:41:39.253+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Respite</title><summary type='text'>FactcheckingPollyanna is on holiday until next Friday.
</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115042209911314432/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115042209911314432' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115042209911314432'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115042209911314432'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/06/respite.html' title='Respite'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-115017463952810959</id><published>2006-06-13T05:57:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-06-13T05:58:40.796+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Stange factoids, indeed</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

    The whole sector spends £25bn a year (the state spends £400bn).

Actually, at £457bn, it's closer to £500bn (see Public sector finances, April 2006.  pdf link here).  Being right to the closest £100bn is quite a low bar for accuracy...
She also says:

    Is it the same nostalgic delusion that led John Major to dismantle the railways, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/115017463952810959/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=115017463952810959' title='6 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115017463952810959'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/115017463952810959'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/06/stange-factoids-indeed.html' title='Stange factoids, indeed'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>6</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114985093203059067</id><published>2006-06-09T12:02:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-06-11T17:06:28.376+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Talking of re-offending...</title><summary type='text'>Today's column offers a wide selection of misquoted and misinterpreted statistics.  Let's start with:

 Crime is in long-term decline, down 43% since 1995, according to the British Crime Survey (BCS)

According to the Home Office, (pdf link here to Crime in England and Wales 2004/2005 -- oh, yes, by the way, it is worth noting, though Polly doesn't, that this only covers England and Wales):

 </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114985093203059067/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114985093203059067' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114985093203059067'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114985093203059067'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/06/talking-of-re-offending.html' title='Talking of re-offending...'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114957394230221972</id><published>2006-06-06T07:05:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-06-06T07:50:09.636+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Putting the poll into Polly</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:

  The latest Ipsos Mori poll yesterday put the Conservatives 10 points ahead, at 41%; only six months ago they were 10 points behind.

And yet, when we look at, oh, I don't know, say the, er, Observer on the 18 December 2005, in a piece headlined:

  Tories seize nine-point poll lead

This is from a MORI poll, conducted between 9 and 12 December 2005, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114957394230221972/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114957394230221972' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114957394230221972'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114957394230221972'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/06/putting-poll-into-polly.html' title='Putting the poll into Polly'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114943618181826086</id><published>2006-06-04T16:49:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-06-04T17:25:56.616+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Better or Worse? p.209</title><summary type='text'>Today, my copy of Better or Worse? fell open to page 209.  On it, Polly Toynbee and David Walker write:

    In February 2003, Tony Blair stepped in to make another of his eye-catching promises.  He pledged to halve the number of asylum seekers within six months.

Actually, no.  This is how a Guardian report from 8 February 2003 characterised what he said:

    "I would like to see us </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114943618181826086/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114943618181826086' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114943618181826086'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114943618181826086'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/06/better-or-worse-p209.html' title='Better or Worse? p.209'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114923436832284805</id><published>2006-06-02T08:46:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-06-02T08:48:16.536+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Numerical fragility</title><summary type='text'>Today's Polly Toynbee column says of the tax credit system:

   That means 20% will be overpaid and 10% will be underpaid.  How bad is that?  Not all that bad.  The standard error rate of the social security system for means-tested benefits under all governments has always been around 10%.

Actually, if you are overpaying 20% and underpaying 10%, that means an error rate of 30%, considerably </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114923436832284805/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114923436832284805' title='7 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114923436832284805'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114923436832284805'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/06/numerical-fragility.html' title='Numerical fragility'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>7</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114897283383103381</id><published>2006-05-30T07:29:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-05-30T12:02:48.500+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Queue Rating</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly Toynbee writes:
Chris Smith is one of the few politicians to retire knowing he has done something brilliant - restoring free entry to museums and galleries, swelling attendances by 50%.I hadn't appreciated that a seat in the House of Lords counted as retirement, but anyway.  Swelling museum attendance by 50% looks like quite a good thing, until you  consult the  official </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114897283383103381/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114897283383103381' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114897283383103381'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114897283383103381'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/05/queue-rating.html' title='Queue Rating'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114862353464920573</id><published>2006-05-26T06:45:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-05-30T11:54:41.503+01:00</updated><title type='text'>OFFS</title><summary type='text'>In today's column, Polly wirtes about the by-elections to the Wyre borough Council in Lancashire.  She writes:
Last Thursday, two weeks after the main local elections, there was a byelection in Park Ward, the poorest in Lancashire and the second-safest Labour seat in the county; activists piled in to support a good local candidate.

But they were shocked to lose, with a staggering 27% swing to </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114862353464920573/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114862353464920573' title='7 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114862353464920573'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114862353464920573'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/05/offs.html' title='OFFS'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>7</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114856243715249364</id><published>2006-05-25T14:07:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-05-25T14:07:18.346+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Better or Worse? p.190</title><summary type='text'>More opening of the book to a random page.  On page 190 of Better or Worse?, Toynbee and Walker write:

    "...by 2005 it [i.e. DFID] was pushing £9 out of every £10 in UK aid to low-income countries.  Half of DFID's bilateral aid went to Africa..."

No.  According to the DFID's Statistics on International Development 2005 (aka SID), in 2004/5 DFID's total bilateral programme was £2.14bn, of</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114856243715249364/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114856243715249364' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114856243715249364'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114856243715249364'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/05/better-or-worse-p190.html' title='Better or Worse? p.190'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114854174589849855</id><published>2006-05-25T08:22:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-05-25T08:22:30.453+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Better or Worse? p.78</title><summary type='text'>In a quiet fifteen minutes, I have discovered a new game -- opening my copy of Better or Worse?, the 2005 book written by Polly Toynbee and David Walker, to a random page and seeing how many dubious facts I could find.  This morning, it was page 78 (my copy is a Bloomsbury paperback).
I found this quote:

    In the media they [apparently newspaper editors and BBC directors] controlled, they </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114854174589849855/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114854174589849855' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114854174589849855'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114854174589849855'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/05/better-or-worse-p78.html' title='Better or Worse? p.78'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114837265463992593</id><published>2006-05-23T08:47:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-05-23T09:27:00.610+01:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Apologies again for the late discovery of today's column by Polly; I could not find it through www.guardian.co.uk's search feautre, and actually still can't as at the time of writing.  It does, however, appear on CommentisFree here.

She starts by saying:
Here global warming is measured by how often the steel gates are closed; in 1987, it was only once every two years: now it's four times a year,</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114837265463992593/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114837265463992593' title='7 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114837265463992593'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114837265463992593'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/05/apologies-again-for-late-discovery-of.html' title=''/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>7</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114836643471551912</id><published>2006-05-23T07:28:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-05-23T09:25:50.626+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Not knowing your enemy</title><summary type='text'>No column in the Guardian today, but I notice that Polly has contributed to the May/June issue of Progress magazine in the form of a column called Any Questions.  From that column come this question and answer:
If you were able to spend an hour with one dead, historical figure, who would it be and what would you ask them?Abraham – Could you be dissuaded from founding three world religions which </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114836643471551912/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114836643471551912' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114836643471551912'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114836643471551912'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/05/not-knowing-your-enemy.html' title='Not knowing your enemy'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114807944692528324</id><published>2006-05-19T23:14:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2007-11-02T20:36:06.066Z</updated><title type='text'>Pollyannomymous</title><summary type='text'>In a post today on CommentisFree, Polly writes of people who criticise her anonymously:
Tell me something else, how many of you bother to buy the Guardian? Here we are, the only non-profit paper with no megalomaniac owner, like all newspapers in need of paying readers at a time when the press is in decline.Given that the paper loses money and the website makes money, I would be positively </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114807944692528324/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114807944692528324' title='10 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114807944692528324'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114807944692528324'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/05/pollyannomymous.html' title='Pollyannomymous'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>10</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114802401379504541</id><published>2006-05-19T07:46:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-05-19T08:33:33.893+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Unclear</title><summary type='text'>On days like today, I feel disappointed I elected to critique factual accuracy rather than, say, writing style.  In today's column, potatoes are launched, and herrings hijack.  She manages to speak to the energy minister, Malcolm Wicks, and she writes:
So I asked Malcolm Wicks the vital question.The vital question, it turns out, is this:
Will nuclear power get any special inducement not offered </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114802401379504541/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114802401379504541' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114802401379504541'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114802401379504541'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/05/unclear.html' title='Unclear'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114776526555256165</id><published>2006-05-16T08:28:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-05-18T13:38:58.276+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Ironic quote marks?</title><summary type='text'>Today's column is relatively free from fiction masquerading as facts (they are, of course, all relatively free of facts).  However, Polly makes up for it by mangling a quote.  Consider this quote from Pollyanna's column:
Professor Roger Silverstone, of the LSE, calls the research hopeful, "revealing the emergence of a dynamic, socially engaged and environmentally conscious" voter - not a few, but</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114776526555256165/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114776526555256165' title='10 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114776526555256165'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114776526555256165'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/05/ironic-quote-marks.html' title='Ironic quote marks?'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>10</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114741768313980442</id><published>2006-05-12T07:49:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-05-15T23:39:33.190+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Right to lie?</title><summary type='text'>Today's column, on the right to die, contains this quote:
In the polls, over 80% support the right to die and have done for the last 25 years.The best poll I know of in the UK for measuring changes in social attitudes is the British Social Attitudes Survey.  Care to guess what they have to say about the issue?  Well, they report that:
Opinion polls show that not only do euthanasia and assisted </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114741768313980442/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114741768313980442' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114741768313980442'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114741768313980442'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/05/right-to-lie.html' title='Right to lie?'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114719429462139300</id><published>2006-05-09T17:53:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-05-09T18:04:54.630+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Criminal statistics</title><summary type='text'>Polly claims today, in a piece about the recent local elections, that we should:
Take Hammersmith and Fulham: it boasted the biggest fall in crimeIt is a claim she has made before, and it wasn't sourced or qualified then either.
At the time of writing, as was the case before the local elections, this claim is not supported by the Metropolitan Police's Crime Figures website which, as of 9 May 2006</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114719429462139300/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114719429462139300' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114719429462139300'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114719429462139300'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/05/criminal-statistics.html' title='Criminal statistics'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27516474.post-114686373224730493</id><published>2006-05-05T21:51:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2006-05-17T10:16:23.386+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Copying from the Telegraph</title><summary type='text'>Polly Toynbee's column today is relatively fact-free (well, they always are, but at least this time there aren't a lot of non-facts masquerading as facts).  however, she does say:
Indeed, recent research on child care found that children left with grandparents all day did worse than children in good nurseries.As ever with Pollyanna, there is no source, but at a guess she is referring to an </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/feeds/114686373224730493/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27516474&amp;postID=114686373224730493' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114686373224730493'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27516474/posts/default/114686373224730493'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://factcheckingpollyanna.blogspot.com/2006/05/copying-from-telegraph.html' title='Copying from the Telegraph'/><author><name>FactcheckingPollyanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07539350837343626125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry></feed>
